Skip to content

Qinglong has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-3965: Improper Authentication

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 12, 2026 in whyour/qinglong • Updated Aug 20, 2026

Package

npm @whyour/qinglong (npm)

Affected versions

< 2.20.1

Patched versions

2.20.1

Description

Summary

The init guard middleware in Qinglong only checks /api/user/init paths but not /open/user/init, which is whitelisted from JWT authentication and rewritten to /api/user/init after the guard has already passed, allowing unauthenticated admin credential reset on initialized instances.

Affected Package

  • Ecosystem: npm
  • Package: whyour/qinglong
  • Affected versions: < 6bec52dca158
  • Patched versions: >= 6bec52dca158

Severity

Medium

CWE

CWE-287 — Improper Authentication

Details

The Qinglong panel has an initialization endpoint (/api/user/init) that allows setting admin credentials. Once the system is initialized, an init guard middleware is supposed to block further calls. The middleware in back/loaders/express.ts only checks:

!['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower)

However, the application also has a URL rewrite rule: rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1'). The /open/* paths are whitelisted from JWT authentication.

The middleware ordering creates the bypass: first, JWT auth sees /open/* paths match the whitelist regex and skips authentication. Second, the init guard only checks for /api/user/init -- /open/user/init passes through as "not an init path". Third, the URL rewrite transforms /open/user/init to /api/user/init after the guard has already passed.

This means an unauthenticated attacker can send PUT /open/user/init with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance, gaining full administrative access.

PoC

/**
 * CVE-2026-3965 - Qinglong Panel /open/user/init Auth Bypass
 *
 * The init guard middleware only checks /api/user/init paths.
 * But /open/user/init is whitelisted from JWT auth and rewritten
 * to /api/user/init via express-urlrewrite AFTER the guard.
 */

"use strict";

// Simulate the init guard middleware exactly as in the source
function initGuardMiddleware(reqPath, authInfo) {
  const pathLower = reqPath.toLowerCase();
  // Exact check from the vulnerable source
  if (!['/api/user/init', '/api/user/notification/init'].includes(pathLower)) {
    return { action: "next" }; // passes through
  }

  let isInitialized = true;
  if (
    Object.keys(authInfo).length === 2 &&
    authInfo.username === 'admin' &&
    authInfo.password === 'admin'
  ) {
    isInitialized = false;
  }

  if (isInitialized) {
    return { action: "block", code: 450, message: "Error" };
  } else {
    return { action: "next" };
  }
}

const authInfo = { username: "realAdmin", password: "str0ngP@ss!" };
console.log("System state: initialized (non-default credentials)");

// Test 1: Direct /api/user/init is blocked
const test1 = initGuardMiddleware("/api/user/init", authInfo);
console.log("\n[Test 1] PUT /api/user/init:");
console.log("  Guard result:", test1.action);
console.log("  Blocked:", test1.action === "block");

// Test 2: /open/user/init BYPASSES init guard
const test2 = initGuardMiddleware("/open/user/init", authInfo);
console.log("\n[Test 2] PUT /open/user/init:");
console.log("  Guard result:", test2.action);
console.log("  Bypassed guard:", test2.action === "next");

if (test2.action === "next") {
  const rewrittenPath = "/open/user/init".replace(/^\/open\//, "/api/");
  console.log("  After rewrite:", rewrittenPath);
  console.log("  Reaches init handler: true");
}

if (test1.action === "block" && test2.action === "next") {
  console.log("\nVULNERABILITY CONFIRMED: /open/user/init bypasses the init guard");
  console.log("An attacker can reset admin credentials on an initialized instance.");
  process.exit(0);
} else {
  console.log("\nVULNERABILITY NOT CONFIRMED");
  process.exit(1);
}

Steps to reproduce:

  1. git clone https://github.com/whyour/qinglong /tmp/qinglong_test
  2. cd /tmp/qinglong_test && git checkout 6bec52dc~1
  3. node poc.js

Expected output:

VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED
/open/user/init bypasses the init guard; the guard only checks /api/user/init but /open/ path is whitelisted and rewritten after.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can send PUT /open/user/init with new credentials to reset the admin account on any Qinglong panel instance. This provides full administrative access, enabling the attacker to execute arbitrary cron jobs and scripts on the server.

Suggested Remediation

Add /open/user/init and /open/user/notification/init to the init guard check list. Alternatively, move the URL rewrite middleware to run before the init guard. Consider implementing the init guard at the handler level rather than as path-based middleware.

References

References

@whyour whyour published to whyour/qinglong Jun 12, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 15, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 20, 2026
Reviewed Aug 20, 2026
Last updated Aug 20, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(49th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55445

GHSA ID

GHSA-v667-gc2r-2xm7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.