patch to load_changeset to also load has_many -> through changes - #22
Conversation
e6aaa17 to
3d2014d
Compare
|
I think it is likely desirable that we would sometimes want to call the default |
|
What about doing something similar to how |
|
Sure |
|
@punkisdead could you please add some documentation for this as well? |
Yes, absolutely. I've got a few other tasks that are taking priority right now, but will get back to it in a day or two. |
e58fba3 to
aa1e4e4
Compare
|
@punkisdead I saw you made some changes and updated the documentation Please advise once you are done. Do you still intend to add the other relationship functionality? |
I hadn't intended to add the other relationship functionality in this PR, selfishly our needs were only for this. I can possibly look into adding them later in a separate PR if you'd like. |
|
It would be sweet if we could add them within this PR. |
|
Ok, let me see what I can do. |
|
I would love this feature. I dont really need to reify anything but would love to be able to diff including the has_many associations |
|
+1 for this feature. Just tried it on paper_trail 15.1 and got the following error: |
I had a need to try to track changes of a has many through relationship using paper trail and have leveraged some of the work in this project to do so. I'd like to start a conversation about how to best accomplish this, and also add the functionality to the other association types
has_many,has_one, etc.Below is the start of this work, and it is working for what our case needs, but still needs better testing and some refactoring yet.